objectives
members
enquires
annual report
press release
articles
articles
political objectives
 

CAMPAIGN FOR COMMUNITY BANKING SERVICES


 

A MUST FOR EVERY ELECTION MANIFESTO

   
  "“The economics of running a major retail network in the UK no longer stack up”
  Michael Geoghegan, Chief Executive HSBC 22 May 2009
 

This statement at HSBC’s 2009 AGM could just as well have been made by the other three traditional banks: Barclays, Lloyds TSB (LBG) and NatWest (RBS) whose networks are very similar in size and geographic spread. This poses multiple threats, far beyond loss of banking access, to vulnerable individuals, small businesses and communities throughout the country.

40% of bank branches have closed since 1990. 1500 communities with only one or two banks remaining (always one of the traditional big four) are now, more than ever, in the firing line----
--and our political leadership is failing to come forward with alternative proposals.

Access to banking is key to the survival of retail and other services in many medium sized rural communities and in less well-off suburbs, estates and inner-cities. If active people and small businesses go to bank elsewhere, they spend elsewhere too and those that suffer most from loss of local amenities are the most vulnerable: older and disabled people, those with mobility difficulties, and carers - and yet government stands aside and lets it happen.

Given that a solution proven viable in UK studies and operating successfully throughout the US, has been on the table for over ten years, continued inaction on the part of a government is not acceptable in the new financial and political climate. The opportunity to act, as we deal with the consequences of the recession for all our financial institutions and lay plans for a new architecture, has never been more favourable and urgent. The solution is not just a rescue package, but brings qualitative and tangible gains across a range of social and economic fronts. It:

  • Improves access for customers of all banking providers
  • Enhances sustainability of communities’ other services
  • Is a standard bearer for ‘localism’
  • Helps post offices, credit unions and CDFIs.
  • Aids financial inclusion
  • Reduces carbon emissions1

AND, to a government seeking to dispose profitably of majority stakes in two of the four relevant banks, provides the opportunity to save up to £1billion p.a.2  in branch network costs thereby aiding an early return to pre-crisis profitability.

1. Examples: Liss, Hants 1m miles a year (360 tonnes); Shepshed, Leics 1.4m miles a year (500 tonnes).

2. Based on validated estimate of net savings realisable from adopting for the secondary and tertiary tiers of their networks the alternative delivery channels which substantially reduce costs but retain competitive choice for consumers.

THE SOLUTION

FLEXIBLE FORMAT SHARED BRANCHING


Basic counter and related services, to agreed operating standards, delivered by a third party provider(s) on behalf of participating banks through a variety of delivery channels – retail franchises, community banks and banking centres – as appropriate to each community and locality. The model which uses existing common technology can replace existing branches and make it possible to establish a banking presence in new communities cost effectively.

 
The undeniable growth in usage of alternative banking channels – ATMs, on-line, telephone, cashback – is the strongest reason why individual banks will close more branches but also the strongest reason why the neutral shared branching option is both necessary and viable: 100% of those in the community who need a counter come through its doors and costs are shared.
 
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
  1. Use the UKFI shareholdings in RBS and LBG to bring about piloting of neutral shared branching in vulnerable communities as a low risk pathway to substantial delivery cost savings elsewhere in the networks.

2. Require Post Office Limited, and encourage the credit union movement, to engage with these pilots, since they are increasingly nudging into the banking sector.

3. Instruct the Treasury’s Financial Inclusion Taskforce (or similar post Election body) to undertake the consideration of shared branching recommended by the Treasury Committee in November 2006; agreed by the Taskforce but not actioned.

4. Impose on banks seeking to close a branch, a legal obligation to consult and to satisfy regulators that the shared branching alternative has been fully considered. This would enforce consideration of shared branching and also the under publicized Inter Bank Agency Arrangements which enable use of another bank’s counter on an agency basis.
 
Contact Details: CCBS SUPPORTING ORGANISTIONS
Derek French Director
50 Roundwood Park
Harpenden
Herts
AL5 3AF
Tel: 01582 764760

Website: www.communitybanking.org.uk
Action for Market Towns
Action with Communities in Rural England
Age Concern England
Association of Convenience Stores
Bassac
Campaign to Protect Rural England
Commission for Rural Communities
Community Development Finance Association
Consumer Focus
Debt on our Doorstep
Federation of Small Businesses
Forum of Private Business
Help the Aged
Money Advice Scotland
National Association of Local Councils
National Federation of Womens’ Institutes
National Pharmacy Association
New Economics Foundation
SCOPE
Street UK
Unite
Which?
 
August 2009